2010年4月27日星期二

Is Nice Clegg a True Liberal?

Nick Clegg has had sex with 'no more' than 30

 UK's JFK?!

The Daily Telegraph 01 Apr 2008


Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg has spoken unusually frankly about his romantic past, admitting to sleeping with "no more than 30" women and revealing how he fell in love at first sight with wife Miriam.

In a no-holds-barred interview with magazine GQ, Mr Clegg recalled being "pretty gobsmacked" on first meeting the Spanish senator's daughter when they were both studying in Belgium.
After first wooing her in French, he learnt to speak Spanish for her sake, he said.


Pressed to reveal more, the Lib Dem leader said he had been in love twice before meeting his wife - once in an "unrequited" passion and once with a childhood sweetheart - but "definitely" regarded her as the love of his life.

And he went on to respond to a series of increasingly personal questions from interviewer Piers Morgan, who asked whether he saw himself as "good in bed".

"I don't think I am particularly brilliant or particularly bad," said the Lib Dem leader.

"Since the only judge of that is my wife..."

Mr Morgan insisted that there had been other women in his life and he replied: "Yes OK, well, not for a very long time."

When Morgan asked to know how many, Mr Clegg attempted to brush off the question by answering: "Not a list as long as yours, I'm sure".

But the interviewer would not be deflected, asking: "How many are we talking: 10, 20, 30?" "No more than 30," replied Mr Clegg.

"It's a lot less than that."

PM: "Ever had any complaints?"

NC: "Oh God yes, of course."

PM: "What would your wife say?"

NC: "I think she'd be very content and happy."

PM: "Would you ever be unfaithful to her?"

NC: "I certainly hope not."

Remembering his first meeting with Miriam, he said: "We were at the same college in Belgium. She was leaning against a wall outside an induction lecture, and that was that...

"I was pretty gobsmacked when I first saw her... Her English was rubbish and my Spanish non-existent. So we got by in French for a bit but then I learnt Spanish."

Mr Clegg is not the first politician to be subjected to a grilling on his personal life by GQ.

Former Conservative leader William Hague famously told the magazine in 2000 that he drank as many as 14 pints of beer a day while delivering drink to pubs in a student holiday job.

The Lib Dem leader was asked about his own alcohol intake, and said he did not drink every day and was last drunk "probably last summer... drinking wine with my family in France".

The alcoholism of his predecessor Charles Kennedy was "very difficult and unpleasant, for him and the party", said Mr Clegg, who said it would be "pretty hard" to run the country as an alcoholic.


A lot less than 30 is how many?



By CRAIG BROWN
05 April 2008

The Daily Telegraph


Calculators at the ready, and no conferring. It would take a skilled mathematician to work out what exactly Nick Clegg meant by "a lot less than 30''. Obviously 29 could never be called a lot less than 30; I'd say that 25, though less than 30, could not be termed a lot less. To my mind, the highest figure that could nevertheless be called a lot less than 30 is 24. But then one is also a lot less than 30, and so, too, is zero. But I don't suppose zero is an option, as Nick Clegg is married with children.

You know that a week has been uneventful when the news that the leader of the Liberal Democrats has admitted sleeping with "a lot less'' than 30 women is given its own headline. Paddy Ashdown became known to one and all as Paddy Pantsdown after admitting sleeping with less than three women, but more than one; now it seems that Nick Clegg will be known for the rest of his life as Nick Cleggover. At least we never had to come to terms with Sir Fling Campbell.

Every now and then, one famous person or another makes news by totting up his conquests and boasting about the score. In 1977, the Belgian crime writer Georges Simenon announced: "I did the sum a year or two ago and, since the age of 13?, I have had 10,000 women.'' As he was 74 at the time, this gave him an unlikely average of a different woman every day for 60 years.

If he was telling the truth, Simenon makes the Romanian tennis ace Ilie Nastase seem monastic. In his autobiography, Nastase wrote: "I think I've slept with 2,500 women.'' A year or two ago, the high-waisted TV personality Simon Cowell claimed in an interview: "I've had between 70 and 100 women, if I were to hazard a guess.'' Meanwhile, in his bumptious autobiography, The Living Legend, the chirpy DJ Tony Blackburn boasted: "Sex is very important to me. I adore making love. I've made love to about 250 women.'' All in all, Nick Clegg has a lot of catching up to do. You may attempt to argue that leaders of the main political parties and Tony Blackburn have different aims and values, but there you would be wrong. There is in fact an intriguing love-line, detailed in the invaluable 1987 reference book Who's Had Who, that links President Reagan with Tony Blackburn in just eight bed-hops.

For your interest, the chain goes Ronald Reagan - Nancy Reagan - Clark Gable - Ava Gardner - Frank Sinatra - Carol White - Richard O'Sullivan - Tessa Wyatt - Tony Blackburn. (Incidentally, another chain linking high politics to low pop goes like this: Eva Peron - Porfiro Rubirosa - Ava Gardner - Sir Gordon White - Vanessa Llewellyn - Dai Llewellyn - Tessa Dahl - Peter Sellers - Britt Ekland - Les McKeown of The Bay City Rollers.)

Generally speaking, politicians like to underestimate their conquests, while showbiz and arts figures prefer to overestimate them. The only exception is Jimmy Carter who decided to give an interview to Playboy just before the 1976 presidential election so as to jazz up his rather goody-goody Baptist image. "I've looked on a lot of women with lust,'' he confided, just as the interview was winding down. "I've committed adultery in my heart many times. This is something that God recognises I will do - and I have done it - and God forgives me for it.'' The admission (or was it a strange sort of boast?) seemed to pay off, as two weeks later Carter was elected President.

Other presidents have taken the more traditional less-than-two-but-more-than-none route, even when their truer total might have run to double or even triple figures. "Move over, this is your president,'' LBJ said, a mite bullishly, having entered the bedroom of a female aide at his ranch in Texas.

When Kennedy became President in 1961, an aide predicted, "This administration is going to do for sex what the last one did for golf'' - and so it transpired. There are obviously many possible bed-hopping lines to be traced to and from JFK, but one of the most colourful goes: JFK - Marilyn Monroe - Frank Sinatra - Jill St John - Robert Wagner - Natalie Wood - Warren Beatty - Joan Collins - Ryan O'Neal - Farrah Fawcett Majors - Sylvester Stallone.

The only prime ministerial chain that Britain can offer in competition is, it must be admitted, somewhat pitiful, with just two stops. It goes like this: John Major - Edwina Currie. At a stretch, it could, I suppose, be extended to three: John Major - Edwina Currie - Steve Norris, and then from "Shagger'' Norris to heaven-knows-where.

Mrs Currie has in the past suggested that she and Norris got together when they were sixth-form students in Liverpool, though Steve Norris rather ungallantly pooh-poohs the very idea. "For reasons best known to herself, Edwina has since chosen to suggest that our relationship was rather more developed'', he wrote in his 1996 autobiography. "She may, I suppose, have imagined a brief fumble under her school blouse behind St George's Hall to be an orgasmic experience, but I fear I was less impressed.'' Who are we to believe - Norris or Currie? There are some things that are too painful to contemplate. Either way, Edwina Currie and Steve Norris are a far cry from Marilyn Monroe and Jack Kennedy.

Now that Ken Livingstone has entered the fray, announcing that he has five children by three women, the question is raised: should we be any more interested in the sexual appetites of politicians than we are in the political appetites of sex symbols?
I doubt the news that Jordan voted for three different parties in five different elections would merit much of a headline. Yet whenever a politician claims to have had sex, we find ourselves eager to read on. Ten, 20, 30?

Do I hear an advance on 30? And how many children does that make? At the moment, only Ann Widdecombe is not prepared to join in the fun.

For too long, party fund-raising at the constituency level has been restricted to guessing the weight of a chocolate cake, or the number of boiled sweets contained in a glass jar. The Lib Dems could raise a small fortune by getting their members to place their bets on the exact number of their leader's sleepovers. If it really is more than 20 but "a lot less'' than 30, my fiver would be on 22, but who's to tell?

Lib Dem leader admits his pillow talk was all a bit of a distraction


15 April 2008
The Daily Telegraph

NICK Clegg expressed regret yesterday at discussing his prowess as a lover in an interview with a men's magazine.

Mr Clegg, who pledged when he became Liberal Democrat leader to make political life as "open and accessible'' as possible, was asked by Piers Morgan how many women he had slept with. "No more than 30,'' he replied.

After four months of trying to make an impact as leader of the third party Mr Clegg's claims in GQ magazine catapulted him into the limelight.

However, he conceded yesterday that he had attracted attention for all the wrong reasons. "If I have any regrets, it is that it serves as a distraction from the things that I passionately care about, which [are] that I think there are far too many families who are over-stretched [and] hard-pressed, [and] we don't yet have local authorities which are as environmental or as tough on crime and anti-social behaviour as I think we can be,'' he said.

In the interview, Mr Clegg gave a modest appraisal of his bedroom skills when he said: "I don't think I am particularly brilliant or particularly bad''. The remarks irritated Lib Dem MPs and heaped embarrassment on their leader, underline his inexperience. Mr Clegg, 41, who is married with a child, has been an MP since 2005.

In the ensuing furore, he was dubbed "Nick Cleggover'' by the tabloid press.

重慶文強案評論

重慶文強案評論


2010年4月24日星期六

......我想起Lucian Pye...

有來有往的朋友,當然還包括當年才俊團的成員。提起才俊團,飛哥忽爾說:「跟你講個笑話!」原來,他早前跟李國能、李柱銘等碰面,李國能突然問他:「幾時帶我地去北京見世侄!」世侄者,正是現時主管香港事務的國家副主席習近平也。當年他們到北京見的那位書記習仲勛,就是現今不少香港政客事事要逢迎的習近平之父!當然,一向幽默兼且早已沒有回鄉證的李柱銘也來湊興,插嘴問:「係囉、係囉,幾時帶我地去見世侄?!」「李國能宣布退休之後,個人都輕鬆哂!哈哈!」早已退下政壇的飛哥,當然明白到無官一身輕的道理。

(Kong. HKEJ 24 April 2010)

Research Article




The State and the Individual: An Overview Interpretation (CQ-1991-Issue 127, 443-466 Cambridge University Press)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lucian W. Pye

It could be that no people have ever outdone the Chinese in ascribing moral virtues to the state or in deprecating the worth of the individual. First Confucianism and then the Chinese version of Leninism went all out in extolling the importance of rulers and society and in minimizing the rights of individuals. The gap between the moral worth and the recognized rights of state and citizen in China was and remains huge both because of the way the Chinese have consistently given paramountcy to the state and the ways in which they have subordinated the individual to the group. The extraordinary imbalance in the relations of the state and individuals provides both the structural and the cultural bases for the human rights practices which are now the most contentious issues between China and the west, especially the United States. What is outrageous to Americans can be for most Chinese normal expectations – although since Tiananmen a majority may feel that the state has gone too far.

(Also look at: 69 Foreign Aff. 56 (1989-1991) China: Erratic State, Frustrated Society; Pye, Lucian W.)

2010年4月22日星期四

The Price of Admission .....攀附﹑冷言冷語﹑獻身 ﹑默默忍受......荊棘滿途、悲劇收場..

明報

2010-04-20
MP+觀點
By 吳志森

泛民一廂情願繼續自動獻身

紙上女星,攀附豪門,放出聲氣,要跟富家二世祖「溝通」。半山豪宅,門高狗大,守衛森嚴, 「溝通」云云,只是自說自話,一廂情願。女星非常努力,到處打聽「溝通」門路。今天,找到了聲稱替富豪門衛熟稔的一位朋友,談起來十分投契,開記者會宣布,與富家子「溝通」的計劃,大有進展。明天,約好了替富豪清潔的阿嬸,也能無所不談,對嫁入豪門,女星表現得信心滿滿。

正當女星到處放風,說婚期已近,下半生將盡享榮華富貴之際,富家子突然宣布婚訊,與舊愛共諧連理。拍拖多年,舊愛深知二世祖脾性,絕不逆其意懂得百分百遷就,亦深明豪門規矩,不會有半步行差踏錯。消息傳出,紙上女星十分錯愕,含兩泡眼淚,在記者面前訴苦,但口風一轉,又聲言絕不放棄,會繼續「溝通」,希望終有一天,富家子能回心轉意。阿嬸門衛,也出來發話,叫女星不要灰心:富家子只想測試女星是否真心,有沒有誠意,即使真的結婚了,新娘不是你,只要繼續堅持,說不定將來富家子會回頭找你。聽了這番話,女星頭頂泛起了一片金黃的陽光,心中又再充滿了希望……

這不是娛樂版的八卦消息,而是政情版的嚴肅新聞。事前毫無徵兆,特區政府突然宣布一個保守得驚人的2012 政改方案,在主張「溝通」的溫和民主派瀕臨反之際,無論民主派內部,還是所謂直通天庭的南來探子,抑或是有名有姓的中南海紅人,都以權威口吻,通過各放風渠道,勸說「不要絕望,繼續溝通」,但傳出來的信息,有些不用細想就知道是不值一哂的歪理,有些卻比佛偈還要深奧難明,想半天都無法理解。例如: 「不要急於反,可能只是想測試溫和民主派是否真正想溝通,是否真的有誠意。」又例如: 「溝通之門剛剛打開,不是關上,切勿誤讀。」再例如一位接近天庭的香港人,以一貫苦口婆心的語調說: 「門未開,亦未關……將來如何發展仍未知道……」

泛民還留在幼兒園階段

玄之又玄的猜謎遊戲不停上演,港人暈頭轉向。似是而非的所謂消息論據,也使溫和民主派如墮五里霧中,東南西北都無法搞清楚。五一六臨近,泛民自亂陣腳,當然無法搞出什麼名堂。7 月立法會就政改方案投票,也可能臨時拋什麼小恩小惠的所謂讓步,而方寸大亂。泛民雖然在香港爭取民主幾十年,但與阿爺比較,政治鬥爭政治謀略,還留在幼兒園階段。

紙上女星,被導演用三寸不爛之舌,誘騙剝了光豬,拍了全裸三級片,女星一把眼淚一把鼻涕哭訴被人欺負。小事一樁,導演派人到女星耳邊講了幾句,女星馬上破涕為笑,自動獻身,今後任何高難度動作,都依足導演的吩咐,答應照辦……


MP+觀點 明報 湯家驊

2010-04-22


窮家女的故事

早兩天,資深評論員吳志森寫了一篇「紙上女星攀附豪門」的文章,細緻描述女星一心想嫁入豪門,到處打聽「溝通」門路,卻被富豪的清潔阿嬸和門高狗大的門衛欺騙,自取其辱。文章結尾時,吳志森更指女星被導演「誘騙剝光豬拍全裸三級片」,尊嚴盡喪,悲劇收場。

吳志森的故事情節可能有點誇張,表面上是真實的。只是他並沒有耐性尋求故事背後的真相罷了。其實女星出身於貧困家庭,父母早喪,遺下了兩男一女。女星排行第二,上有一位哥哥,下有一位幼弟。幼弟剛進幼稚園,女星很希望他能升讀名校,憑自己努力,尋求上進,造福社會;唯獨這學校的校董正是富家子弟之家族成員。女星的哥哥也希望幼弟能出人頭地,但他生性偏激,只懂得終日在學校門前嘈吵擲物,試圖引起校董注意,打開入讀大門。但他的行動愈激烈,校董愈反感,甚至敕令即使幼弟成績卓越也絕不取錄。


女星有見及此,別無他法,唯有含辛茹苦、忍辱負重,甚至出賣色相,為的並非希望嫁入豪門,而是只求能與校董一見,訴之以情、說之以理,令幼弟有機會能出人頭地。當然,出賣色相與玉石俱焚的心態都是要不得,最終可能同樣是徒勞無功,但冷嘲熱諷、大肆咆哮、甚至作出人身攻擊的旁觀者又有什麼良謀上策,可令幼弟推向上進之途?要論犧牲,若言艱苦,女星所做的,可能比哥哥門外不停叫嚷更為痛苦,更不獲同情和諒解。今天世態炎涼,捧高踩低的冷言冷語,女星也只好默默忍受。吳志森的文章正是鐵證。

不少人對女星早存不屑之心

更重要的是,女星可能因此一役而永難尋找良眷、一生歸宿盡。她只希望她的努力和苦心終有一天會為幼弟所理解;這對女星來說,已是足夠的認同和回報了。當然,吳志森先生未能全面掌握故事的真相是情有可原的。要理解女星的苦心和努力,必須先對中央與港人在政治權力上之強弱懸殊、香港政治力量的分佈形勢、港人對爭取普選相對於對中港關係的看法,及是否認同要以激烈行動衝擊制度等問題有某一程度的了解、分析和思考。在這方面,坐在冷氣房內安家評天下,和站在最前線、每天要與政治對手博弈之同時亦要面對選民是有很大分別的。最重要的,是不少人本身對女星早存不屑之心,以至她的一舉一動也看不過眼。女星一生注定荊棘滿途、悲劇收場亦與此不無關係。

2010年4月21日星期三

呼喚耀邦亡魂 嘆奇冤問蒼天 (Source: 丁望. HKEJ. 21 April 2010)

呼喚耀邦亡魂 嘆奇冤問蒼天


四月的江南,多陰天。在陰天,在寒風細雨中,許多人千里迢迢來到江西東北的共青城;在改革家胡耀邦的陵園獻上一束鮮花,對他寄以無盡的哀思。

還有人在媒體發表文章紀念胡氏,溫家寶總理在《人民日報》發表的〈再回興義憶耀邦〉、《炎黃春秋》月刊的幾篇文章,引起的迴響最大。

溫氏的文章,表示敬佩胡氏的實事求是、致力於改革和「光明磊落的高尚品德」;說他「密切聯繫群眾、關心群眾疾苦」。

《炎黃春秋》的劉崇文回憶錄,記述胡氏下台前後(一九八七)和亡故前後(一九八九)的高層爭論、胡氏的心境,頗具文獻參考價值。

人們懷念胡氏,抒發對冤案不平之情,在哀思中表達悲劇不再重演的期望,恰似唐.李商隱(八一三至八五八)詩云:「路有論冤謫,言皆在中興。」胡氏的悲劇,在於以極大的魄力平反一九五五年以來的政治冤案,讓數千萬人(包括黑五類家屬)走出政治的地獄,他自己卻在政治冤屈中鬱鬱以終。這是今天紀念胡氏應深思之處。


小平翻臉 耀邦蒙冤下台

劉崇文曾任共青團中央辦公廳主任,八八、八九年擔任耀邦的政治秘書,對耀邦的改革理念和政治處境了解很深。

劉崇文回憶錄的墨處,本欄歸納為三點。第一,是八七年一月以「黨內生活會」的突擊方式批耀邦,是他未料及的;更令他意外的是,是大家長鄧小平翻臉,狠狠把他整下台。

劉說:「在中央生活會前,耀邦同志完全被蒙在鼓裏。……他壓根兒沒想到,沒過兩天,鄧小平就找他談話,嚴厲地批評他,接著就是被迫辭職,中央召開他的『生活會』,最後被免去總書記職務。」劉崇文透露:「在他下台前後,小平同志曾對他說,你的問題揭到哪裏算哪裏,讓大家揭。還說:你總覺得我妨礙了你!你想樹立自己的形象!生活會後,他(按:指耀邦)曾同李昭(按:耀邦夫人)去看望過鄧小平一次,談了十五分鐘左右,鄧很冷淡。在我們日常的交談中,他盡量回避鄧小平和陳雲同志,萬不得已時也從不直呼他們的名字,而是用摸右邊耳朵代表指小平,摸左邊耳朵代表指陳雲,可見其之噤若寒蟬。」第二,是耀邦下台後背負「待罪之身」的包袱,不敢輕意走訪朋友、與民眾見面,有話欲言還止,有再遭秋後算帳的恐懼。

劉崇文說,他「還心有餘悸,唯恐再有什麼閃失,又招致不測。」劉又透露,他想外出走走,「想到天津去,覺得和李瑞環比較熟悉,去他那兒可能方便一些,……總覺得自己現在『待罪』之身,深怕連累、影響了別人」。

羅織罪名 免職程序不公

第三,是耀邦一再向劉崇文提及劉少奇的冤案,意在應深思出現此冤案的制度弊端。

在劉崇文的回憶錄發表之前,中共中央前政治局常委胡啟立、政治局委員田紀雲,在《炎黃春秋》發表過文章,紀念耀邦並讚揚他的改革,特別強調他任總書記期間決定的大事,都經過中央書記處討論(啟立、紀雲均為書記處書記),婉轉地為胡氏辯護,但避免觸及大家長。

劉崇文則直言小平翻臉不認人的冷酷、對耀邦的誤會造成政治冤案。這正是許多人想說而不敢說的事實。

耀邦的冤屈,在於一批人給他強加罪名,免職的程序並不公正。

八七年一月的中共中央政治局擴大會議,免去耀邦的總書記。會議公報指責他「違反黨的集體領導原則,在重大的政治問題上失誤。」這是一批元老和極左派羅織的罪名,耀邦經手的政策決定,都經書記處討論通過、報大家長小平和副家長陳雲批閱。

以「黨內生活會」的方式迫耀邦下台,由政治局擴大會議決定總書記的職務,是程序的不公正。

在八七年一月十八日即政治局擴大會議公報刊出次日,筆者在《信報》第二版發表短評,指出對耀邦的處置違背中共黨章第二十二條,總書記的任免權在中共中央委員會全體會議,政治局擴大會議出席者有的並非中央委員,無權決定總書記的任免。

免於恐懼 政治文明標誌

清.袁枚(一七一六至一七九七)詩云:「平生自想無官樂」(消夏詩)。耀邦被免職,不再在政治漩渦中,本應可以過風平浪靜的日子,但他卻不能「免於恐懼」。他的餘悸在於大家長的變臉。

耀邦在五十年代曾任中共川北區委書記,自了解川劇的變臉,變臉之術快速正是川劇的特點。但他卻未料到小平會變臉(總覺得小平對他的了解很深),令他有口莫辯,這是他最難消受的冤屈。

他另一料想不到的,是狠批他的一批高幹,竟是與他能推心置腹的朋友,有的還是經常到他家吃飯、打牌的「親密戰友」(可參閱耀邦女滿妹的《思念依然無盡》)。

從五十年代的高饒事件直到胡耀邦、趙紫陽的政治事件,都是「莫須有」的冤案。禍源在於「一黨領導」體制的弊端:沒有權力制約,沒有黨內民主,一言堂式的家長制剝奪了黨員應有的權益。

連中共中央的總書記下台後也不能「免於恐懼」,芸芸眾生更難「免於恐懼」。

胡溫當政後,雖不再發生高層的政治冤案,但建立在法律之下「免於恐懼」的文明社會,仍是舉步艱難。

心淡?

前些天,我到貴州黔西南察看旱情。走在這片土地上,望著這裡的山山水水,我情不自禁地想起24年前隨耀邦同志在這裡考察調研的情形,尤其是他在興義派我夜訪農戶的往事。每念及此,眼前便不斷浮現出耀邦同志誠摯坦蕩、平易近人的音容笑貌,胸中那積蓄多年的懷念之情如潮水般起伏湧動,久久難以平復。

 1986年年初,耀邦同志決定利用春節前後半個月時間,率領由中央機關27個部門的30名幹部組成的考察訪問組,前往貴州、雲南、廣西的一些貧困地區調研,看望慰問各族幹部群眾。耀邦同志想以此舉做表率,推動中央機關幹部深入基層,加強調查研究,密切聯繫群眾。

 當時,我剛調任中央辦公廳副主任不久,耀邦同志讓我具體負責組織這次考察訪問工作。2月4日上午,耀邦同志帶領考察訪問組全體成員從北京出發,前往貴州安順。由於安順大霧,飛機臨時改降貴陽。當天下午,耀邦同志又換乘麵包車奔波4個多小時趕到安順。晚飯後,耀邦同志召開會議,把考察訪問組人員分成三路,分頭前往雲南文山、廣西河池和貴州畢節地區。

 第二天清晨,耀邦同志帶著我和中央辦公廳幾位同事從安順出發,乘坐麵包車,沿著曲折的山路在黔、滇、桂交界處的崇山峻嶺中穿行。耀邦同志儘管已年過七旬,但每天都爭分奪秒地工作。他邊走邊調研,甚至把吃飯的時間都用上,每天很晚休息。離開安順後的幾天裡,耀邦同志先後聽取貴州鎮寧、關嶺、晴隆、普安、盤縣和雲南富源、師宗、羅平縣的匯報,沿途不斷與各族群眾交流,瞭解他們的生產生活情況。他還在羅平縣長底鄉與苗族、布依族、彝族、漢族群眾跳起《民族大團結》舞。2月7日傍晚,耀邦同志風塵僕僕趕到黔西南州首府興義市,入住在州府低矮破舊的招待所。

 時已立春,興義早晚的天氣仍然陰冷潮濕。由於沒有暖氣,房間裡冷冰冰的。我們臨時找來3個小暖風機放在耀邦同志的房間,室溫也只有攝氏12度左右。經過幾天馬不停蹄地奔波調研,耀邦同志顯得有些疲憊。我勸他晚上好好休息一下,但他仍堅持當晚和黔西南州各族幹部群眾代表見面。

 晚飯前,耀邦同志把我叫去:「家寶,給你一個任務,等一會帶上幾個同志到城外的村子裡走走,做些調查研究。記住,不要和地方打招呼。」


 到中央辦公廳工作之前,我就聽說耀邦同志下鄉時,經常臨時改變行程,與群眾直接交流,瞭解基層真實情況。用他常說的話就是,「看看你們沒有準備的地方」。所以,當耀邦同志給我佈置這個任務時,我心裡明白:他是想盡可能地多瞭解基層的真實情況。


 天黑後,我帶著中央辦公廳的幾位同志悄悄離開招待所向郊外走去。那時,興義城區只有一條叫盤江路的大路。路旁的房子比較低矮,路燈昏暗,街道冷清。我們沿著盤江路向東走了10多分鐘就到了郊外。這裡到處是農田,四週一片漆黑,分不清東南西北。看見不遠處,影影綽綽有幾處燈光,我們便深一腳淺一腳摸了過去。到近處一看,果然是個小村子。進村後,我們訪問了幾戶農家。黑燈瞎火的夜晚,純樸的村民們見到幾個外地人感到有些意外,但當知道我們來意後,很熱情地招呼我們。

 晚上十點多,我們趕回招待所。我走進耀邦同志的房間,只見他坐在一把竹椅上正在等我。我向他一五一十地匯報了走訪農戶時瞭解到的有關情況。耀邦同志認真地聽著,還不時問上幾句。他對我說,領導幹部一定要親自下基層調查研究,體察群眾疾苦,傾聽群眾呼聲,掌握第一手材料。對擔負領導工作的人來說,最大的危險就是脫離實際。多年來,耀邦同志這幾句語重心長的話經常在我耳旁迴響。

 2月8日是農曆大年三十。耀邦同志一大早來到黔西南民族師範專科學校,向各族教師拜年並和他們座談。接著,他又興致勃勃地趕到布依族山寨烏拉村看望農民,並到布依族農民黃維剛家做客。黃維剛按照布依族接待貴客的習俗,把一個燉熟的雞頭夾放在耀邦同志的碗裡。就這樣,耀邦同志和黃維剛全家有說有笑地吃了頓團圓年飯。

 隨後,耀邦同志又乘汽車沿山路行駛一百多公里,趕到黔桂交界處的天生橋水電站工地,向春節期間堅持施工的建設者們致以節日的問候。當晚,耀邦同志在武警水電建設部隊招待所一間簡陋的平房中住下。不久,他開始發燒,體溫升到38.7度。事實上,從午後開始,耀邦同志就感到身體不適。不過,他依舊情緒飽滿地參加各項活動。

 除夕之夜,辭舊迎新的鞭炮在四周響個不停,但大家沒有心思過年。我和耀邦同志身邊的工作人員一直守候著他。2月9日,初一早晨,耀邦同志的體溫達到39度。這裡遠離昆明、貴陽、南寧等大城市,附近又沒有醫院,大家都很著急。好在經過隨行醫生的治療,耀邦同志到晚上開始退燒,大家的心才放了下來。

 2月10日上午,身體稍稍恢復的耀邦同志不顧大家的勸阻,堅持前往廣西百色。經過320多公里的山路顛簸,耀邦同志於晚上6點多到了百色。在百色期間,耀邦同志帶著我們參觀了中國工農紅軍第七軍舊址,並與百色地區8個縣的縣委書記座談。2月11日晚,我們趕到南寧。隨後兩天,耀邦同志在南寧進行短暫的休整。我根據耀邦同志的要求,又帶著幾個同志到南寧市郊區就農業生產、水牛養殖、農產品市場等問題進行調研。每次回到住地,他總是等著聽我的匯報。14日和15日,耀邦同志經欽州前往北海市,先後考察了北海港和防城港的港口建設。2月16日,耀邦同志又折回南寧,與三路考察訪問組人員會合。接著,他用兩天半的時間聽取了考察訪問組和雲南、廣西、貴州的匯報。

 2月19日下午,耀邦同志根據自己13天沿途調查的思考並結合有關匯報,在幹部大會上作了即席講話。他特別強調,中央和省級領導幹部要經常到群眾中去,到基層去,進行調查研究,考察訪問,密切上級與下級、領導機關同廣大人民群眾之間的聯繫。這樣,不僅可以形成一種好的風氣,產生巨大的精神力量,更重要的是有助於實現正確的領導,減少領導工作的失誤,提高幹部的素質,促進幹部特別是年輕幹部健康成長。

 1986年2月20日下午,耀邦同志率領考察訪問組回到北京,結束了歷時半個多月的西南貧困地區之行……

 時光飛逝。耀邦同志當年帶領我們在西南考察時的情形歷歷在目,彷彿就在昨天。今年4月3日,當我再次來到興義市時,簡直不敢相信自己的眼睛:原先低矮落後的小城已發展成為一個高樓林立的現代化城市,興義城區現在的面積比1986年拓展了4倍多,城區人口增長近3倍。

 睹物思人,觸景生情。耀邦同志派我夜訪的情景又在眼前,一股舊地重尋的念頭十分強烈。當天晚飯後,我悄悄帶了幾個隨行的同志離開駐地,想去尋找那個多年前夜訪過的村莊。燈火輝煌的盤江路上,商舖林立,十分熱鬧。原先那個村莊早已不在,取而代之的是一幢幢拔地而起的高樓。我堅持要再夜訪一個村莊,仍然只帶隨行的幾個工作人員來到郊外。在遠處幾片燈光引領下,我們走進永興村,敲開農戶雷朝志的家門,和他及他的鄰居們聊了起來……

 耀邦同志離開我們21年了。如今,可以告慰耀邦同志的是,他一直牽掛的我國西南貧困地區發生了翻天覆地的變化,他竭盡畢生精力為之奮鬥的國家正沿著中國特色社會主義道路闊步前行。
 1985年10月,我調到中央辦公廳工作後,曾在耀邦同志身邊工作近兩年。我親身感受著耀邦同志密切聯繫群眾、關心群眾疾苦的優良作風和大公無私、光明磊落的高尚品德,親眼目睹他為了黨的事業和人民的利益,夜以繼日地全身心投入工作中的忘我情景。當年他的諄諄教誨我銘記在心,他的言傳身教使我不敢稍有懈怠。他的行事風格對我後來的工作、學習和生活都帶來很大的影響。1987年1月,耀邦同志不再擔任中央主要領導職務後,我經常到他家中去看望。1989年4月8日上午,耀邦同志發病搶救時,我一直守護在他身邊。4月15日,他猝然去世後,我第一時間趕到醫院。1990年12月5日,我送他的骨灰盒到江西共青城安葬。耀邦同志去世後,我每年春節都到他家中看望,總是深情地望著他家客廳懸掛的耀邦同志畫像。他遠望的目光,堅毅的神情總是給我力量,給我激勵,使我更加勤奮工作,為人民服務。

 再回興義,撫今追昔,追憶耀邦。我寫下這篇文章,以寄托我對他深深的懷念。

Any comment?  Here is my comment:
 
我每日捱著 不睬不理
但卻捱不死 又去痴纏你
難道終此一生
都要這麼 不可爭一口氣

連自尊都忘記
跌到極麻木 只好相信
又再爬得起 就會有轉機
若我不懂憎你 如何離別你

亦怕不會飛
由這一分鐘開始計起 春風秋雨間
恨(限)我對你以半年時間 慢慢的心淡
付清 賬單
平靜的對你熱度退減

一天一點傷心過 這一百數十晚
大概也夠我 送我來回地獄又折返人間
春天分手 秋天會習慣
苦沖開了便淡
(說甚麼再平反)

只怕被迫一起 更礙眼
(往後這半年間)
只愛自己 雖說不太習慣
畢竟有限 就當 過關

2010年4月17日星期六

The UK's first prime ministerial TV debate


NICK CLEGG: I actually agree, strongly agree, and it's something I've been calling for for years, that we should have a complete review about whether our military equipment is right for the job that we are asking our brave soldiers and brave servicemen and women to do. Because of course the world is changing and the threats to this country are changing with it. What I simply don't understand is if we hold that review, as I think is going to be likely after the general election, whoever wins that election, both David Cameron and Gordon Brown want to rule out one of the biggest items of defence expenditure of all, which is the Trident nuclear missile system. This was a system that was designed at the height of the Cold War to flatten St Petersburg and Moscow. Is it really that important?

ALASTAIR STEWART: Let me bring David Cameron in on that point.

DAVID CAMERON: Let me answer that directly because I think it's important. I think the most important duty of any government, anyone who wants to be Prime Minister of this country, is to protect and defend our United Kingdom. And are we really happy to say that we'd give up our independent nuclear deterrent when we don't know what is going to happen with Iran, we can't be certain of the future in China, we don't know exactly what our world will look like? I say we should always have the ultimate protection of our independent nuclear deterrent. That's why we voted to make sure that happened.

 
("LORD" Cameron: I really dont know what you were thinking. Hit Beijing with your Trident...)